The Ecology of Assessment: Evaluation in Educational Settings

Auteurs-es

  • Robert J. Wilson Queen’s University
  • Ruth Rees Queen’s University

Mots-clés :

Educational evaluation, Assessment models, Measurement, Reliability, Validity, Decision making

Résumé

On a grand besoin d’un modèle théorique qui servirait à l’évaluation de cadres éducationnels complexes. Nous proposons un premier modèle qui comprend trois composantes (mesure, jugement et prise de décision) et des critères complémentaires (fiabilité, validité et utilité) ainsi qu’un second modèle fondé sur les recherches de Parsons (1986), Beer (1979) et Rees (1983). Ce dernier modèle décrit le cadre éducationnel provincial comme hiérarchique et interdépendant, les niveaux inférieurs étant situés dans le sous-système opérationnel des niveaux immédiatement supérieurs. Le développement d’une banque d’items provinciale illustre l’utilité de ces deux modèles.

Références

Anthony, R.N. (1965). Planning and control systems. Boston: Harvard Administration.

Beer, S. (1979). The heart of enterprise. Chichester, UK Wiley.

Cronbach, L.J. (1971). Test validation. In R.L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational Measurement (2nd ed.) (pp. 443-507). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

Cronbach, L.J., Gleser, G.C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory ofgeneralizabilityforscores and profiles. New York:John Wiley & Sons.

Emery, F.E., & Trist, E.L. (1969). Socio-technical systems. In F.E. Emery (Ed.), Systems thinking (pp. 281-296) New York: Penguin.

Fullan, M., & Park, P. (1981). Curriculum implementation. Toronto: Ministry of Education, Government of Ontario.

Leithwood, K.A., Wilson, R.J. & Marshall, A.R. (1978). Final report: The development and implementation of a strategy for comprehensive program evaluation for Ontario school systems. Toronto: Ministry of Education. Unpublished.

Leithwood, K.A., Wilson, R., & Marshall, A.R. (1981). Increasing the influence of evaluation studies on program decision-making. In A. Lewy & D. Nevo (Eds.), Evaluation roles in education. London: Gordon & Breach.

McLean, L.D. (1982). Report ofthe 1981field trials inEnglish and mathematics: Intermediate division. Toronto: Ministry of Education.

Messick, S. (1975). The standard problem: meaning and values in measurement and evaluation. American Psychologist, 30, 955-965.

Parsons, T. (1956). Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 63-85, 225-239.

Rees, R. (1983). The interorganizational collectivity: A study of the Manpower institutional training system in Manitoba. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.

Scriven, M. (1967). Methodology of evaluation. In R. Tyler, R. Gagn6, & M. Scri (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 39-83). Chicago: Rand McNally

Scriven, M. (1974). The evaluation of educational g and outcomes or The iceman cometh. In J. Blan (Eds.), Program development in education (pp. 134 British Columbia.

Stoner, J.A.F. (1978). Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Stufflebeam, D.L., Foley, W.J., Gephart, W.J., Guba, E.G., Hammond, R.L., Merriman H.O., & Provus, M.M. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision-making. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.

Weick, KE. (1977). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addi Wesley.

Wilson, R.J. (1989). Evaluating student achievement in an Ontario high school. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 35, 134-144.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

16-10-2026

Comment citer

Wilson , R. J., & Rees , R. (2026). The Ecology of Assessment: Evaluation in Educational Settings. Revue Canadienne De l’éducation, 15(3), 215–228. Consulté à l’adresse https://cje-rce.ca/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/8439

Numéro

Rubrique

Articles