Research Needed on Critical Thinking

Authors

  • Stephen P. Norris Memorial University of Newfoundland

Keywords:

critical thinking, inductive inference, generalizability, transfer of learning, critical thinking assessment, inference appraisal

Abstract

The teaching of critical thinking, long held an important goal of education, is finally being taken seriously in schools, colleges, and universities. However, much research remains to be done on questions that Robert Ennis said over two decades ago were in need of answer. This paper discusses two issues in need of research, the generalizability of critical thinking, and the evaluation of critical thinking ability. Some of the conceptual and empirical work required on these topics is indicated, and it is argued that the combined expertise of philosophers, psychologists, and subject matter specialists is needed to do the work well.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ennis, R. H. (1963). Needed: Research in critical thinking. Educational Leadership, 21(1), 17–20, 39.

Ennis, R. H. (1981). Rational thinking and educational practice. In J. F. Soltis (Ed.), Philosophy and education (pp. 143–183). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

Ennis, R. H. (1985a). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44–48.

Ennis, R. H. (1985b). Critical thinking and the curriculum. National Forum, 65(1), 28–31.

Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). New York: W. H. Freeman.

Ennis, R. H., & Millman, J. (1985). Cornell Critical Thinking Test, Level X. Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.

Gilligan, C. (1979). In a different voice: Women’s conception of self and morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 481–515.

Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

McPeck, J. (1984). Stalking beasts, but swatting flies: The teaching of critical thinking. Canadian Journal of Education, 9, 28–44.

Norris, S. P. (1984a). Cynicism, dogmatism, relativism, and scepticism: Can all these be avoided? School Science and Mathematics, 84, 484–495.

Norris, S. P. (1984b). Defining observational competence. Science Education, 68, 129–142.

Norris, S. P. (1985a). The choice of standard conditions in defining critical thinking competence. Educational Theory, 35, 97–107.

Norris, S. P. (1985b). Synthesis of research on critical thinking. Educational Leadership, 42(8), 40–45.

Norris, S. P. (1985c). Studies of thinking processes and the construct validation of critical thinking tests. St. John’s, NFLD: Institute for Educational Research and Development, Memorial University of Newfoundland.

Norris, S. P. (1986a). Evaluating critical thinking ability. History and Social Science Teacher, 21(3), 34–45.

Norris, S. P. (1986b). Justifying nonstandard multiple choice critical thinking tests. In D. A. Nyberg (Ed.), Philosophy of education 1985 (pp. 27–31). Normal, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.

Norris, S. P. (in press). Using studies of thinking processes to develop multiple-choice tests of informal reasoning competence. In D. N. Perkins, J. Segal, & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Norris, S. P. & King, R. (1984). The design of a critical thinking test on appraising observations. St. John’s, NFLD: Institute for Educational Research and Development, Memorial University of Newfoundland.

Paul, R. W. (1985). The critical thinking movement: A historical perspective. National Forum, 65(1), 2–3, 32.

Phillips, L. (1987). Inference strategies in reading comprehension. Technical Report No. 410. Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Phillips, L. (in press). Young readers’ inference strategies in reading comprehension. Cognition and Instruction.

Siegel, H. (1986). McPeck, informal logic and the nature of critical thinking. In D. A. Nyberg (Ed.), Philosophy of education 1985 (pp. 61–72). Normal, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.

Watson, G. & Glaser, E. M. (1980). Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. Cleveland, OH: Psychological Corporation.

Yarmey, A. D. (1979). The psychology of eyewitness testimony. New York: The Free Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-14

How to Cite

Norris , S. P. (2026). Research Needed on Critical Thinking. Canadian Journal of Education Revue Canadienne De l’éducation, 13(1), 125–137. Retrieved from https://cje-rce.ca/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/8329

Issue

Section

Articles