Standard English and the Teaching of Literacy
Keywords:
Standard English, Literacy education, Language variation, SociolinguisticsAbstract
The debate about Standard English as the exclusive form of the language taugh in school literacy programs might be moderated by the distinction between linguistic and communicative parity of language forms. Although different form of language have equally adequate structures, not all forms are equally effectiv for all purposes of communication. Standard English is not just a neutral for for the expression of independent meaning: it is a discursive practice that make possible the sharing of particular meanings among privileged members of a community. Effective use of Standard English is an unavoidable curriculum go Standard English should be taught, not exclusively, but along with respect fo and acceptance of non-standard forms of English that children, and especiall young children, have acquired from their communities. Teachers should see non-standard forms not as errors and bad grammar, but as systematic represe tations of meaning and experience.
References
Bizzell, P. (1988). Arguing about literacy. College English, 50, 141-153
Borodkin, T.L. (1981, March). Standardization and the English teacher in t Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on Composition and Communication, Dallas.
Cheshire, J. (1982). Dialect features and linguistic conflict in schools. Review, 34(1), 53-67.
Cressy, D. (1980). Literacy and the social order: Reading and writing in Stuart England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Daniels, H.A. (1983). Famous last words: The American language crisis re Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Finegan, E. (1980). Attitudes toward English usage: The history of a war of York: Teachers College Press.
Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the wo Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
Gee, J.P. (1986). Orality and literacy: From the savage mind to ways w TESOL Quarterly, 20, 719-746.
Gee, J.P. (1987). What is literacy? Teaching and Learning, 2, 3-11.
Gilbert, W.H. (1980, March). The non-standard speaker and "standard Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on Composition and Communication, Washington, DC.
Harman, S., & Edelsky, C. (1989). The risks of whole language l Alienation and connection. Language Arts, 66, 392-406.
Hirsch. E.D. Jr. (1977). The philosophy of composition. Chicago: Un Chicago Press.
Jarvis, P. (1987). Paulo Freire: Educationalist of a revolutionar movement. Convergence, 20 (2), 30-41.
Kachru, B.B. (1986). The alchemy of English: The spread, functions, non-native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
McClain, S.R., Spencer, N.M., & Bowman, B.B. (1979, Novembe English: A prerequisite for professional careers. Paper presented a Meeting of the National Urban Education Association, Detroit.
Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1985). Authority in language: Investigati prescription and standardization. London: Routledge & Kegan Pau
Platt, J., Weber, H., & Ho Mian, L. (1984). The new Englishes. Londo & Kegan Paul.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: University Press.
Rubin, J. (1976). Language and politics from a sociolinguistic poin W.M. O'Barr & J.F. O'Barr (Eds.), Language and politics (pp. 3 Hague: Mouton.
Sledd, A. (1988). Readin' not Riotin': The politics of literacy. College 495-508.
Sledd, J. (1988). Product in process: From ambiguities of Standard English issues that divide us. College English, 50, 168-176.
Sledd, J. (1984, March). Teaching Standard English: False premises and promises. (ERIC DOCUMENT ED 248 529).
Smitherman, G.D. (1987). Toward a national policy on language. College Eng 49, 29-36.
Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Tuman, M.C. (1987). A preface to literacy: An inquiry into pedagogy, practice, and progress. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. Laurie Walker is in the Faculty of Education, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, T1K 3M4.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Canadian Journal of Education follows Creative Commons Licencing CC BY-NC-ND.