Des faiblesses du modèle expérimental à l’évaluation adaptive-interactive des interventions en éducation
Keywords:
évaluation en éducation, plan expérimental, recherche qualitative, signification statistique, interventions éducativesAbstract
The purpose of this text is to regenerate thinking about the coherence of approaches in educational research. Referring to text books, many researchers use experimental designs such as those developed by Fischer and widely employed by Campbell and Stanley. This short article points out several problems with this research approach when applied to evaluating influencing forces in education, and then presents Huberman's adaptive-interactive perspective for which there seems to be a more coherent methodology.
References
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. Dans N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally. 171-246.
Cardinet, J. (1979). L'élargissement de l'évaluation. Education et Recherche, 1, 15-53.
Carver, R. P. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378-399.
Checkland, P. B. (1972). Towards a systems based methodology for real-world problem solving. Journal of Systems Engineering, 3, 87-116.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116-127.
Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hein, G. E. (1980). L'évaluation selon la perspective de l'école ouverte. Dans Cl. Paquette, G. E. Hein, & M. Q. Patton, Evaluation et pédagogie ouverte. Victoriaville, Qc: NHP, 53-110.
Huberman, A. M. (1981). Splendeurs, misères et promesses de la recherche qualitative. Education et Recherche, 3, 233-249.
Huberman, A. M. (1983). S'évaluer pour s'illusionner? Promesses et écueils de l'évaluation “adaptive-interactive” des innovations scolaires. Neuchatel: Cahiers du Groupe des chercheurs romands de la Société Suisse pour la recherche en éducation, 9.
Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. (1982). Innovation up close. Andover: Network.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Morin, A. (1984). L'évaluation anthropopédagogique. Dans Cl. Paquette (Ed.), Des pratiques évaluatives. Victoriaville, Qc: NHP, 159-202.
Paquette, Cl. (1980). L'évaluation ouverte et participative. Dans Cl. Paquette, G. E. Hein, & M. Q. Patton, Evaluation et pédagogie ouverte. Victoriaville, Qc: NHP, 111-201.
Paquette, Cl. (1984). Des pratiques évaluatives. Victoriaville, Qc: NHP.
Paquette, Cl., Hein, G. E., & Patton, M. Q. (1980). Evaluation et pédagogie ouverte. Victoriaville, Qc: NHP.
Patton, M. Q. (1980). Un nouveau paradigme de recherche en évaluation. Dans Cl. Paquette, G. E. Hein, & M. Q. Patton, Evaluation et pédagogie ouverte. Victoriaville, Qc.: NHP, 13-52.
Sadler, D. R. (1981). Intuitive data processing as a potential source of bias in naturalistic evaluations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 3(4), 25-31.
Stake, R., & Easley, J. (Eds.). (1978). Case studies in science education. Urbana, IL: Centre for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation.
Van der Maren, J. M. (1977). Le double aveugle contre Pygmalion, éléments de psychosociologie de la recherche en éducation et méthodologie des plans. Revue des sciences de l'éducation, 3, 365-380.
Van Maanen, J. V. (Ed.). (1983). Qualitative methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Wilden, A. (1980). System and structure (2nd ed.). London: Tavistock.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Canadian Journal of Education follows Creative Commons Licencing CC BY-NC-ND.
