Les directeurs et les enseignants face à l’évaluation du personnel enseignant: attitudes et valeurs
Keywords:
directeurs d’école, enseignants du secondaire, valeurs instrumentales, attitudes des enseignants, administration scolaire, systèmes de valeursAbstract
Canadian and American research has shown that principals and teachers see teacher evaluation differently. Generally speaking, principals see it positively and teachers have reservations about it. Research results indicate that principals’ and teachers’ values and interests may explain their attitudes to teacher evaluation. The present study aims empirically to confirm differences between principals’ and secondary-school teachers’ practical values, as well as between their views of teacher evaluation. It finds that both values and views are indeed different.
References
Chapman, D. W., Blackburn, R. W., Austin, A. E., & Hutcheson, S. M. (1983). Expanding analytic possibilities of Rokeach values data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 419-421.
Cochrane, R. (1974). Values as correlates of deviancy. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13, 257-267.
Cochrane, R., Billing, M., & Hogg, M. (1979). Politics and values in Britain: A test of Rokeach’s two-value model. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 159-167.
Cochrane, R., & Rokeach, M. (1970). Rokeach’s value survey. A methodological note. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 4, 159-161.
Cole, C. (1978). A comparison of two methods of teacher evaluation (Doctoral dissertation, North Texas State University, 1977). Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 7042A.
Conseil supérieur de l’éducation. (1983). L’évaluation: situation actuelle et voies de développement. Québec: Direction générale des publications gouvernementales.
Cormier-Charette, S. (1977). Le rôle des valeurs dans la personnalité selon Rokeach. Mémoire de maîtrise inédit, Université du Québec à Montréal.
Davis, L. P. (1981). Perceptions of school personnel in the Memphis city school system concerning the teacher evaluation process (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, 1980). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 4227A.
Farris, J. A. (1983). Teacher evaluation process in evangelical christian schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Pacific, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 43A.
Feather, N. T. (1971). Test-retest reliability of individual values and value systems. Australian Psychologist, 6, 181-188.
Feather, N. T., & Collins, J. M. (1974). Differences in attitudes and values of students in relation to program of study at a college of advanced education. Australian Journal of Education, 18, 16-29.
Gross, N., Mason, W. S., & McEachern, A. W. (1958). Explorations in role analysis: Studies of the school superintendency role. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hays, W. L. (1967). Quantification in psychology. Belmont, CA: Brooks, Cole.
Hodgkinson, C. (1970). Organizational influence on value systems. Educational Administration Quarterly, 6, 45-55.
Homant, R. (1969). Semantic differential ratings and the rank ordering of values. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 885-889.
Homant, R., & Rokeach, M. (1970). Values for honesty and cheating behavior. Personality, 1, 153-162.
Houston, S. L. (1981). An analysis of perception of Tennessee Public School teachers, building level administrators and central office administrators toward teacher evaluation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 5911A.
Jones, S. D. (1981). A model for identifying evaluation procedures that have a positive influence on teacher attitude (Doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 4561A-4562A.
Kennedy, K. K. (1980). School administrators value systems: Differences and changes of and among California teachers, principals and superintendents (Doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University, 1980). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 2383A.
Martin, G. S. (1975). Teacher and administrator attitudes toward evaluation and systematic classroom observation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1975). Dissertation Abstracts International, 36, 5780A.
Minguy, C. (1978). Évaluation du personnel dans les écoles élémentaires et les écoles secondaires du Québec. Chicoutimi: Les Éditions Science Moderne.
Munson, J. M., & McIntyre, S. H. (1979). Developing practical procedures for the measurement of personal values in cross-cultural marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 48-52.
Perron, J. (1976). Inventaire de valeurs, traduction de Value Survey (Rokeach, 1968). Document inédit, Université de Montréal.
Perron, J. (1981). Valeurs et choix en éducation. St-Hyacinthe: Edisem.
Piegari, P. (1979). The relationship between elementary school climate and attitudes toward teacher evaluation (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, 1979). Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 3677A.
Pinet, A. L. (1981). L’attitude de l’enseignant francophone du Nouveau-Brunswick face à l’évaluation dudit enseignant. Thèse de maîtrise inédite, Université de Moncton, Nouveau-Brunswick.
Richard, M., & Michaud, P. (1982). La pratique de l’évaluation des enseignants au Nouveau-Brunswick, au Québec et en Ontario. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 8, 255-270.
Rim, Y. (1970). Values and attitudes. Personality, 1, 243-255.
Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rokeach, M. (1969a). Value systems and religion. Review of Religious Research, 11, 2-23.
Rokeach, M. (1969b). Religious values and social compassion. Review of Religious Research, 11, 24-38.
Rokeach, M. (1971). The measurement of values and value systems. In G. Abcarian (Ed.), Political participation and social psychological processes (pp. 50-65). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
Ryan, O. W., & Hickcox, E. S. (1980). Redefining teacher evaluation. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Tobia, E. F. (1984). The relationship between teacher participation in the development of a teacher evaluation process and teacher attitude toward evaluation (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 47A.
Toran, R. A. (1979). An investigation of the current perceptions and ideal expectations of middle/junior high school principals and teachers regarding the principal’s role in teacher evaluation (Doctoral dissertation, Boston College, 1979). Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 1810A.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Canadian Journal of Education follows Creative Commons Licencing CC BY-NC-ND.
