Marxism and the IQ Debate: A Response to Professor Sanders

Authors

  • Michael R. Matthews University of New South Wales

Keywords:

intelligence testing, Marxist critique, heritability, psychometrics, scientific ideology, history of psychology

References

Anastasi, Anne. (1961). Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan.

Block, N., & Dworkin, G. (1976). The IQ controversy. London: Quartet Book

Boring, E. G. (1923). Intelligence as the tests test it. New Republic, 35, 35-3

Brigham, C. (1923). A study of American intelligence. Princeton, NJ: Princ Press. Burt, Cyril. (19go). Experimental tests of general intelligence. British Journal 3, 94-177?

Burt, Cyril. (1966). The genetic determination of differences in intelligence: A study of monozygotic twins reared together and apart. British Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 1966, 137-153.

Burt, C. (1967). Evidence for the concept of intelligence. In S. Wiseman (Ed.), Intelligence and ability (pp. 260-281). Harmondsworth: Penguin. (Original work published 1955)

Chase, A. (1977). The Legacy of Malthus. New York: Knopf.

Cox, C. B., & Dyson, A. E. (1975). Black Papers, 2. London: Critical Quarterly Society.

Eysenck, H.J. (1962). Know your own IQ. Baltimore: Penguin.

Goldberger, A. S. (1976). Mysteries of the meritocracy. In N. Block & G. Dworkin (Eds.), The IQ controversy (pp. 265-279). London: Quartet Books.

Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.

Herrnstein, R. (1973). IQ in the meritocracy. Boston: Little Brown.

Downloads

Published

1987-01-01

How to Cite

Matthews , M. R. (1987). Marxism and the IQ Debate: A Response to Professor Sanders. Canadian Journal of Education Revue Canadienne De l’éducation, 12(1), 184–199. Retrieved from https://cje-rce.ca/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/8288

Issue

Section

Discussion