Syntactic Complexity and Writing Quality: A Review
Keywords:
writing quality, written composition, syntactic maturityAbstract
This article examines the relationship between syntactic complexity (especially as measured by T-unit and clause length) and quality of written composition. Various strands of research over the past fifteen years seem to support the view that the two are positively related. The studies reviewed fall into two broad categories: (a) intervention studies designed to increase syntactic complexity and to examine the effect of such increases on the quality of written composition; and (b) a set of diverse studies which examine the relationship between syntactic complexity and writing quality. The conclusions are: (a) that neither T-unit length nor clause length is a good predictor of writing quality; and (b) that, while sentence-combining studies sometimes seem to improve writing quality, the improvement is probably due to factors other than increases in T-unit and clause length. Implications for teachers in the field are listed.
References
Belanger, J. F. Calculating the syntactic density score: A mathematical problem. Research in the Teaching of English, 1978, 2, 149-53.
Botel, M., & Granowsky, A. A formula for measuring syntactic complexity: A directional effort. Elementary English, 1972, 49 (4), 513-516.
Combs, W. Further effects of sentence-combining practice on writing ability. Research in the Teaching of English, 1976, 10, 137-149.
Combs, W. E. Sentence-combining practice: Do gains in judgments of writing "quality" persist? Journal of Educational Research, 1977, 70, 3 18-321.
Crowhurst, M. The effect of audience and mode of discourse on the syntactic complexity of the writing of sixth and tenth graders (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1977). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1978, 38, 7300A-7301A.
Crowhurst, M. Syntactic complexity in narration and argument at three grade levels. Canadian Journal of Education, 1980 (a), 5, 6-13.
Crowhurst, M. Syntactic complexity and teachers' quality ratings of narrations and arguments. Research in the Teaching of English, 1980 (b), 14, 223-231.
Crowhurst, M., & Piche, G. L. Audience and mode of discourse effects on syntactic complexity in writing at two grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 1979, 13, 101-110.
Di Stefano, P., & Howie, S. Sentence weights: An alternative to the T-unit. English Education, 1979, II, 98-102.
Endicott, A. L. A proposed scale for syntactic complexity. Research in the Teaching of English, 1973, 7, 5-12-
Faigley, L. The influence of generative rhetoric on the syntactic maturity and writing effectiveness of college freshmen. Research in the Teaching of English, 1979, 13, 197-206.
Gebhard, A. 0. Writing quality and syntax: A transformational analysis of three prose samples. Research in the Teaching of English, 1978, 12, 211-232.
Golub, L. S., & Kidder, C. Syntactic density and the computer. Elementary English, 1974, 51, 1128-1131.
Hake, R., & Williams,J. M. Sentence expanding: Not can, or how, but when. In D. Daiker, A Kerek & M. Morenberg (Eds.), Sentence combining and the teaching of writing. Akron, Ohio: L & S Books, 1979.
Hunt, K. W. Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Research Report No. 3,
Champaign, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English, 1965.
Hunt, K. W. Sentence structures used by superior students in grades four and twelve and by superior adults. Tallahassee: Florida State University, 1966.
Hunt, K. W. Syntactic maturity in school children and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1970, 35. (serial No. 134.)
Kinneavy, J. L. Sentence combining in a comprehensive language framework. In D. Daiker, A. Kerek & M. Morenberg (Eds.), Sentence combining and the teaching of writing. Akron, Ohio: L & S Books, 1979.
Loban, W. Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Research Report No. 18,
Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English, 1976.
Mellon, J. C. Transformational sentence-combining. Research Report No. o. Champaign, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English, 1969.
Mellon, J. C. Issues in the theory and practice of sentence-combining: A twenty-year perspective. In D. Daiker, A. Kerek & M. Morenberg (Eds.), Sentence combining and the teaching of writing. Akron, Ohio: L & S Books, 1979.
Miller, B. D., & Ney, J. W. The effect of systematic oral exercises on the writing of fourth-grade students. Research in the Teaching of English, 1968, 2, 44-61.
Morenberg, M., Daiker, D., & Kerek, A. Sentence combining at the college level: An experimental study. Research in the Teaching of English, 1978, 12, 245-256.
Nold, E. W., & Freedman, S. An analysis of readers' responses to essays. Research in the Teaching of English, 1977, 11, 164-174.
Obenchain, Anne. Developing paragraph power through sentence combining. In D.
Daiker, A. Kerek, & M. Morenberg (Eds.), Sentence combining and the teaching of writing.
Akron, Ohio: L & S Books, 1979.
O'Donnell, R. C. A critique of some indices of syntactic maturity. Research in the Teaching of English, 1976, 10, 31-38.
O'Donnell, R. C., Griffin, W. J., & Norris, R. C. Syntax of kindergarten and elementary school children: A transformational analysis. Research Report No. 8. Champaign, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English, 1967.
O'Hare, F. Sentence-combining: Improving student writing without formal grammar instruction. Research Report No. 15. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English, 1973.
Perron, J. D. Writing syntactic complexity and the modes of discourse. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, April, 1977.
Potter, R. R. Sentence structure and prose quality. Research in the Teaching of English, 1967, x, 17-28.
Reesink, G. P., Holleman-van der Sleen, S. B., Stevens, K., & Kohnstumm, G. A. (Development of syntax among school-children and adults: a replication-investigation.) Nederlands Tydschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 1971, 26, 335-364. Psychological Abstracts, 1971, 47, No. 10536.)
Richardson, K., Calnan, M., Essen, J., & Lambert, L. The linguistic maturity of i i-year olds: Some analyses of the written compositions of children in the National Child Develop- ment Study. Journal of Child Language, 1976, 3, 99-115.
Rosen, H. An investigation of the effects of differentiated writing assignments on performance in English composition of a selected group of 15 and i6 year old pupils. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London, 1969.
San Jose, C. P. M. Grammatical structures in four modes of writing at four grade levels (Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1972). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1973, 33, 5411A. (University Microfilms No. 73-9563.)
Schmeling, H. H. A study of the relationship between certain syntactic features and overall quality of college freshman writing. (Doctoral dissertation, George Peabody College for Teachers, 1969). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1970, 30, 4970A. (University Microfilms No. 70-7641.)
Stewart, M. F., & Grobe, C. H. Syntactic maturity and mechanics of writing: Their relationship to teachers' quality ratings. Research in the Teaching of English, 1979, 13, 207-216.
Stotsky, S. L. Sentence-combining as a curricular activity: Its effects on written language development and reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 1975, 9, 30-71.
Sullivan, M. A. Parallel sentence-combining studies in grades nine to eleven. In D. Daiker, A. Kerek & M. Morenberg (Eds.), Sentence combining and the teaching of writing. Akron, Ohio: L & S Books, 1979.
Wijnstra, J. M. Syntaktische kompleksiteit in schriftelijk tallgebruik van zesdeklassers. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 1972, 27, 29-55.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Canadian Journal of Education follows Creative Commons Licencing CC BY-NC-ND.
