Créer, adapter, utiliser : comment les enseignants du primaire préparent-ils leurs supports de cours ?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.6835Keywords:
teaching materials, teacher profiles, mixed-methods approachAbstract
This study explores the diverse approaches adopted by primary school teachers in the preparation of their teaching materials, a critical aspect of their pedagogical practice that directly influences student learning. Using a mixed-methods design combining a survey (N = 183) and interviews (N = 12), we aimed to understand general trends in the use, adaptation, or creation of teaching materials, as well as the specific concerns of different teacher profiles. By examining common and distinct elements across these profiles, this research sheds new light on the complexity of teachers’ pedagogical choices and the dynamics guiding their decisions in the preparation of teaching materials.
Metrics
References
Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009903206236
Akyuz, D., Dixon, J. K. et Stephan, M. (2013). Improving the quality of mathematics teaching with effective planning practices. Teacher Development, 17(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2012.753939
Barbier, E. et Colognesi, S. (2024). Les pratiques préconisées en formation pour faire la classe interviennent-elles dans les planifications des futurs enseignants de français ? Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 47(1), 113–148. https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.5601
Bergeron, L. (2016). La planification de l’enseignement et la gestion pédagogique de la diversité des besoins des élèves en classe ordinaire : une recherche collaborative au primaire [Thèse de doctorat, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières]. Cognitio. https://depot-e.uqtr.ca/id/eprint/8015
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R. et Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, Article 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Bouckaert, M. (2019). Current perspectives on teachers as materials developers: Why, what, and how? RELC Journal, 50(3), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218810549
Cohen, A., Lammé, A., Vermandele, C. et Sraieb, M. (2017). Les enjeux des supports de cours : cas d’un enseignement de statistique en sciences humaines. Statistique et Enseignement, 8(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.3406/staso.2017.1351
Colognesi, S., Coppe, T., Leroux, L. et Wiertz, C. (2024). Does pedagogical metamorphosis exist? Exploring the practices of primary school teachers at different stages of their careers. British Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 2062–2090. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4014
Colognesi, S., Deprit, A., Coppe, T., Van Nieuwenhoven, C., März, V. et Hanin, V. (2021). Developing student teachers’ reflexivity toward their course planning: Implementation of a training program focused on writing and reflective skills. SAGE Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016897
Colognesi, S. et Hanin, V. (2024). Using digital technology in the classroom adds new professional tasks for (student) teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 33(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2023.2293155
Colognesi, S. et Gouin, J.-A. (2020). A typology of learner profiles to anticipate and guide differentiation in primary classes. Research Papers in Education, 37(4), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1849376
Colognesi, S., Van Nieuwenhoven, C. et Beausaert, S. (2020). Supporting newly-qualified teachers’ professional development and perseverance in secondary education: On the role of informal learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(2), 258–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1681963
Colognesi, S., Wiertz, C., Stordeur, M.-F., Moncarey, C., Oliveri, S., Deschepper, C., Van Mosnenck, S., Bollen, P., Leroux, L., Poncelet, C., Forster, T., Benselin, C., Deprez, V., Declercq, P., Verryken, S. et Hanin, V. (2024). A collaborative approach to help future teachers plan their teaching: The Prep.AR tool. PRACTICE, 6(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/25783858.2024.2372259
Conseil de l’éducation et de la formation [CEF]. (2000). Compétences de base des enseignants en Communauté française de Belgique. Conseil de l’Éducation et de la Formation.
Coppe, T., März, V., Coertjens, L. et Raemdonck, I. (2021). Transitioning into TVET schools: An exploration of second career teachers’ entry profiles. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, Article 103317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103317
Coppe, T., März, V., Decuypere, M., Springuel, F. et Colognesi, S. (2018). Ouvrir la boîte noire du travail de préparation de l’enseignant : essai de modélisation et d’illustration autour du choix et de l’évolution d’un document support de cours. Revue française de pédagogie, 204(3), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfp.8358
Coppe, T., Parmentier, M., Kelchtermans, G., Raemdonck, I., März, V. et Colognesi, S. (2024). Beyond traditional narratives about teacher professional development: A critical perspective on teachers’ working life. Teaching and Teacher Education, 139, Article 104436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104436
Coppe, T. (2024). Teacher networks: From a catalyst for enactment of professional development to a source of professional development. Teachers and Teaching, 30(3), 380–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2263734
Coulange, L. (2001). Enseigner les systèmes d’équations en troisième : une étude économique et écologique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 21(3), 305–354. https://revue-rdm.com/2001/enseigner-les-systemes-d-equations/
Creswell, J. W. et Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2e éd.). SAGE.
Deprit, A. (2023). Le développement de la compétence à planifier chez le futur instituteur primaire [Thèse de doctorat, Université catholique de Louvain]. Dial.pr. http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/284069
Deprit, A. et Van Nieuwenhoven, C. (2018). Comment les étudiants se préparent-ils aux stages ? Ressources exploitées et choix stratégiques. Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 41(3), 726–752. https://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/3284
Deprit, A. et Van Nieuwenhoven, C. (2021a). Un impulseur au cœur de la planification des futurs enseignants. Revue française de pédagogie, (213), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfp.11064
Deprit, A. et Van Nieuwenhoven, C. (2021b). Un dispositif axé sur l’analyse de photos pour décoder l’activité réelle de planification des futurs enseignants. Revue internationale de l’AUPTIC, (1), 55–69. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351943092
Edwards, E. et Burns, A. (2016). Action research to support teachers’ classroom materials development. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1090995
Erss, M., Kalmus, V. et Autio, T. H. (2016). ‘Walking a fine line’: Teachers’ perception of curricular autonomy in Estonia, Finland, and Germany. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(5), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1167960
Fenneteau, H. (2015). Enquête : entretien et questionnaire. Dunod. https://doi.org/10.3917/dunod.fenne.2015.01
Giguère, F. et Mukamurera, J. (2019). Les difficultés et les besoins de soutien des enseignants débutants en adaptation scolaire. Éducation et socialisation, (54). https://doi.org/10.4000/edso.8288
Graves, K. et Garton, S. (2015, 11–14 avril). Addressing mismatches between classroom and context and coursebooks [Communication]. 49th Annual IATEFL Conference, Manchester.
Gueudet, G. et Trouche, L. (2008). Du travail documentaire des enseignants : genèses collectifs, communautés. Le cas des mathématiques. Éducation et didactique, 2(3), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.342
Gunn, T. M. et McRae, P. A. (2021). Better understanding the professional and personal factors that influence beginning teacher retention in one Canadian province. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, Article 100073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100073
Harwood, N. (dir.). (2010). English language teaching materials: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, B. R. et Christensen, L. B. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (6e éd.). SAGE.
Kang, H. (2016). Preservice teachers’ learning to plan intellectually challenging tasks. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116676313
Ko, J., Sammons, P. et Bakkum, L. (2014). Effective teaching: A review of research and evidence. The Hong Kong Institute of Education; University of Oxford.
König, J., Bremerich-Vos, A., Buchholtz, C., Fladung, I. et Glutsch, N. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ generic and subject-specific lesson-planning skills: On learning adaptive teaching during initial teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1679115
Lai, E. et Lam, C.-C. (2011). Learning to teach in a context of education reform: Liberal studies student teachers’ decision-making in lesson planning. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2011.558287
Leroyer, L. (2010, janvier). Supports d’enseignement et préparation de classe. Education & Formation, (e-292), 83–96. http://revueeducationformation.be/index.php?revue=8&page=3
Leroyer, L. (2013). Le rapport au support dans le travail de préparation en mathématiques des enseignants du premier degré. Education et didactique, 7(1), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.1608
Maley, A. (2011). Squaring the circle – reconciling materials as constraint with materials as empowerment. Dans B. Tomlinson (dir.), Materials development in language teaching (2e éd., p. 379–402). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139042789.020
McGrath, I. (2013). Teaching materials and the roles of EFL/ESL teachers. Bloomsbury.
Miles, M. B. et Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook (2e éd.). SAGE.
Munthe, E. et Conway, P. F. (2017). Evolution of research on teacher’s planning: Implications for teacher education. Dans D. J. Clandinin et J. Husu (dir.), The SAGE handbook of research on teacher education (p. 836–852). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526402042.n48
Muthén, L. K. et Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8e éd.). Muthén et Muthén.
Mutton, T., Hagger, H. et Burn, K. (2011). Learning to plan, planning to learn: The developing expertise of beginning teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 17(4), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.580516
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T. et Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
Panasuk, R. et Todd, J. (2005). Effectiveness of lesson planning: Factor analysis. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(3), 215–232.
Rabardel, P. (2005). Instrument, activité et développement du pouvoir d’agir. Dans P. Lorino et R. Teulier (dir.), Entre connaissance et organisation : l’activité collective (p. 251–265). La Découverte.
Reuter, Y., Cohen-Azria, C., Daunay, B., Delcambre, I. et Lahanier-Reuter, D. (2013). Dictionnaire des concepts fondamentaux des didactiques. De Boeck Supérieur. https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.reute.2013.01
Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D. et Kauffeld, S. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, Article 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
Strauss, A. et Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. SAGE.
Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000528
Unesco International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP). (2023, 12 janvier). Learning and teaching materials. IIEP Learning Portal.
Vergnaud, G. (2007). Représentation et activité : deux concepts étroitement associés. Recherches en éducation, (4), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.4000/ree.3889
Yang, C.-C. (2006). Evaluating latent class analysis models in qualitative phenotype identification. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 50(4), 1090–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.11.004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Canadian Society for the Study of Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Canadian Journal of Education follows Creative Commons Licencing CC BY-NC-ND.
