L'enseignement personnalisé au collège et à l'université
Keywords:
enseignement personnalisé, enseignement supérieur, collège, université, pédagogieAbstract
Since personalized instruction is a prominent educational movement in the schools, the author strives to determine to what extent it is being used in higher education. First, the aims of personalized instruction are presented along with Keller's personalized system of instruction. Next, the author reviews the advantages of personalized instruction, its particular traits, the organization of courses, and the implementation of such a system. This review is based primarily on experiments conducted in the United States by Keller and his followers. In concluding, the author states her belief that if the role of the professor is "the facilitation of learning in others," then personalized instruction, as described in the systems reviewed in the article, may help him fulfil his role.
Metrics
References
Alba, E., et Pennypacker, H. S. A multiple-change score comparison of traditional and behavioral college teaching procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972, 5, 121-124.
Born, D. G., et Davis, M. L. Amount and distribution of study in a personalized instruction course and in a lecture course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974, 7, 365-375.
Born, D. G.; Gledhill, S. M.; et Davis, M. Examination performance in lecture-discussion and personalized instruction courses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972, 5, 33-43.
Born, D. G., et Herbert, E. W. A further study of Keller's personalized system of instruction. Journal of Experimental Education, 1971, 40, 6-11.
Bristol, M. M., et Sloane, H. N., Jr. Effects of contingency contracting on study rate and test performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974, 7, 271-285.
Cooper, J. L., et Greiner, J. M. Contingency management in an introductory psychology class produces better retention. Psychological Record, 1971, 21, 391-400.
Dottrens, Robert. L'enseignement individualisé. Neuchâtel, Delachaux et Niestlé, 5e éd., 1967.
Farmer, J.; Lachter, G. D.; Blaustein, J. J.; et Cole, B. K. The role of proctoring in personalized instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972, 5, 401-404.
Ferster, C. B. Individualized instruction in a large introductory psychology course. Psychological Record, 1968, 18, 521-532.
Ferster, C. B., et Perrott, M. C. Behavior principles. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1968.
Green, B. A. Physics teaching by the Keller-plan. American Journal of Physics, 1971, 39, 764-775.
Hineline, P. N. An experimental approach to learning: Introduction for students. In In College and University Education, vol. 3, Control of human behavior, de R. Ulrich et al. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman & Co., 1974.
Johnston, J. M., et O'Neil, G. The analysis of performance criteria defining course grades as a determinant of college student academic performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973, 6, 261-268.
Johnston, J. M., et Pennypacker, H. S. A behavioral approach to college teaching. American Psychologist, 1971, 26, 219-224.
Keller, Fred S. Good-bye, teacher. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1, 79-89.
Lenval, Hélène Lubienska de. L'éducation de l'homme conscient et l'entraînement à l'attention. Paris, Éditions Spes, 1968.
Lloyd, K. E. Contingency management in university courses. In In College and University Education, vol. 3, Control of human behavior, de R. Ulrich et al. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman & Co., 1974.
Lloyd, K. E.; Garlington, W. K.; Lowry, D.; Burgess, H.; Euler, H. A.; et Knowlton, W. R. A note of some reinforcing properties of university lectures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972, 5, 151-155.
Lloyd, K. E., et Knutzen, N. J. A self-paced programmed undergraduate course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969, 2, 125-133.
Malott, R. W., et Svinicki, J. G. Contingency management in an introductory psychology course for 1000 students. Psychological Record, 1969, 19, 545-556.
Mawhinney, V. T.; Bostow, D. E.; Laws, D. R.; Blumenfeld, G. C.; et Hopkins, B. L. A comparison of students' studying-behavior produced by daily, weekly, and three-week testing schedules. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1971, 4, 257-264.
McMichael, J. S., et Corey, J. R. Contingency management in an introductory psychology course produces better learning. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969, 2, 79-83.
Miller, F.; Weaver, H.; et Semb, George. A procedure for maintaining student progress in a personalized university course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974, 7, 87-91.
Myers, W. A. Operant learning principles applied to teaching introductory statistics. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1970, 3, 213-220.
Nelson, T. F., et Scott, D. W. Personalized instruction in educational psychology. Michigan Academician, 1972, 4, 293-302.
Pascal, C. E. Instructional options, option preferences, and course outcomes. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1971, 17, 1-11.
Pascal, C. E. Individual differences and preference for instructional methods. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du comportement, 1973, 5(3), 272-279.
Ryan, B. A. PSI, Keller's personalized system of instruction: An appraisal. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, Inc., 1974.
Sheppard, W. C., et MacDermot, H. G. Design and evaluation of a programmed course in introductory psychology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1970, 3, 5-11.
Stalling, R. B. A one-proctor programmed course for introductory psychology. Psychological Record, 1971, 21, 501-505.
Whaley, D. L., et Malott, R. W. Elementary principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Canadian Journal of Education follows Creative Commons Licencing CC BY-NC-ND.
